Build vs. Buy: When RIAs Should Develop Custom WealthTech Solutions

Registered Investment Advisors (RIAs) face a critical decision when it comes to their technology stack: should they build custom solutions in-house, or buy off-the-shelf software from vendors? This "build vs. buy" dilemma is a strategic inflection point, impacting not only operational efficiency but also long-term competitive positioning.

Golden Door Asset's 2026 Benchmark Report, analyzing the technology adoption of 75 RIAs, reveals a wide spectrum of maturity. While the majority of firms operate with foundational or integrated technology stacks, a select group of "Optimized" leaders (12%) leverage technology to achieve a distinct competitive advantage. A key differentiator for these leaders is their willingness to selectively build custom solutions for core functionalities. This article delves into the factors that should drive the "build vs. buy" decision, providing actionable advice for RIAs seeking to maximize their technology ROI and carve out a defensible market position.

The Technology Maturity Landscape in Wealth Management

Our research indicates a clear distribution of technology maturity among RIAs:

Tier 1 (Nascent): 16% of firms (0-2 detected tools)
Tier 2 (Foundational): 39% of firms (3-7 detected tools)
Tier 3 (Integrated): 33% of firms (8-15 detected tools)
Tier 4 (Optimized): 12% of firms (16+ detected tools)

This distribution highlights a significant gap between firms with basic technology adoption and those that have optimized their systems for efficiency and competitive advantage. The journey from "Foundational" to "Optimized" often involves strategically building custom solutions to address unique business needs.

The "Build vs. Buy" Decision Framework

The decision to build or buy should be grounded in a clear understanding of the firm's strategic priorities, internal capabilities, and the available market solutions. Here's a framework to guide the decision-making process:

1. Defining Core Competencies and Differentiation

Identify Core Strengths: What are the unique capabilities that differentiate your firm from competitors? These could be specific investment strategies, client service models, or operational efficiencies.
Assess Competitive Advantage: Which technological functions directly support these core strengths and contribute to a sustainable competitive advantage? For example, a firm specializing in complex tax planning might require a highly customized tax optimization engine.
Example: If your firm's competitive advantage is built on highly personalized financial planning using unique, proprietary algorithms, building a custom planning tool could be a strategic imperative.

2. Evaluating Off-the-Shelf Solutions

Comprehensive Market Research: Conduct thorough research of available software solutions (e.g., CRM systems like Salesforce or Redtail, portfolio management systems like Orion or Black Diamond, financial planning software like eMoney or MoneyGuidePro).
Feature Gap Analysis: Identify the gaps between the features offered by off-the-shelf solutions and your firm's specific requirements. Be realistic about the degree of customization offered by vendors.
Integration Capabilities: Assess the integration capabilities of different solutions. Can they seamlessly integrate with your existing technology stack via APIs?
Total Cost of Ownership: Consider the total cost of ownership, including licensing fees, implementation costs, training expenses, and ongoing maintenance.

3. Assessing Internal Development Capabilities

Technical Expertise: Does your firm have the in-house technical expertise to design, develop, and maintain a custom solution? This includes software engineers, data scientists, and project managers.
Resource Allocation: Are you willing to allocate the necessary resources (time, budget, personnel) to support the development and maintenance of a custom solution?
Opportunity Cost: Consider the opportunity cost of diverting resources from other strategic initiatives to focus on software development.
Long-Term Maintenance: Custom solutions require ongoing maintenance and updates. Can your firm commit to this long-term responsibility?

4. Risk Assessment and Mitigation

Project Execution Risk: Custom software development projects are inherently risky. There is a risk of cost overruns, delays, and technical failures.
Security Vulnerabilities: In-house development can introduce security vulnerabilities if not handled properly.
Vendor Lock-In: While avoiding vendor lock-in is a potential benefit of building a custom solution, it's important to recognize the potential for "self lock-in," where the firm becomes overly reliant on a custom system that is difficult to adapt or replace.
Mitigation Strategies: Develop a comprehensive risk mitigation plan that addresses potential challenges and outlines contingency plans.

When to Build: Key Indicators

While buying off-the-shelf solutions is often the most efficient approach, there are specific scenarios where building a custom solution is the optimal choice:

Proprietary Algorithms and Models: If your firm uses proprietary algorithms or models that provide a unique competitive advantage, building a custom solution to integrate and leverage these assets is often necessary.
Highly Specialized Workflows: When your firm has highly specialized workflows that are not supported by existing software solutions, a custom solution can significantly improve efficiency and reduce manual processes.
Data Integration Challenges: If your firm struggles to integrate disparate data sources using existing tools, building a custom data integration platform can unlock valuable insights and improve decision-making.
Strategic Control: When your firm requires complete control over the technology and its evolution, building a custom solution provides greater flexibility and independence.
Competitive Differentiation: When off-the-shelf solutions don't allow you to deliver a truly differentiated client experience, consider building a custom interface or application to stand out from the crowd.
Example: If an RIA firm uses a very niche asset allocation model that considers a large number of complex factors unique to its client base, and current software lacks the flexibility to implement it, a custom solution could be warranted.

The API Economy and Hybrid Approaches

The proliferation of APIs has blurred the lines between building and buying. RIAs can now leverage APIs to integrate best-of-breed solutions with custom components, creating a hybrid approach that combines the benefits of both.

Custom Integration Layers: Building a custom integration layer can connect disparate systems and create a unified view of client data.
API-Enabled Workflows: Leverage APIs to automate tasks and streamline workflows across different applications.
Microservices Architecture: Develop small, independent services that can be easily integrated and scaled.
Example: An RIA might choose to use a standard CRM like Salesforce but build a custom dashboard on top of it using APIs to display key performance indicators (KPIs) specific to their business.

Building a Competitive Advantage Through Technology

Ultimately, the "build vs. buy" decision should be driven by a desire to create a sustainable competitive advantage. Technology is not merely a cost center; it is a strategic asset that can differentiate your firm, improve client satisfaction, and drive growth.

Focus on Client Experience: Use technology to enhance the client experience, providing personalized insights and seamless digital interactions.
Improve Operational Efficiency: Automate manual tasks and streamline workflows to free up advisors' time for high-value activities.
Enhance Compliance and Risk Management: Implement technology solutions that automate compliance checks and reduce the risk of regulatory violations.
Data-Driven Decision Making: Leverage data analytics to gain insights into client behavior, market trends, and operational performance.

Conclusion: Strategic Technology Investment for RIAs

The decision of whether to build or buy WealthTech solutions is a critical strategic choice for RIAs. While off-the-shelf solutions offer convenience and cost-effectiveness, building custom solutions can provide a significant competitive advantage in certain situations. By carefully evaluating your firm's core competencies, internal capabilities, and the available market solutions, you can make informed decisions that maximize your technology ROI and position your firm for long-term success. The most forward-thinking firms will likely adopt a hybrid approach, leveraging the power of APIs to integrate best-of-breed solutions with custom components, creating a technology stack that is both flexible and powerful.

Call to Action

Are you ready to optimize your technology stack and gain a competitive edge? Contact Golden Door Asset today for a comprehensive technology maturity assessment and strategic roadmap tailored to your firm's unique needs. Let us help you navigate the "build vs. buy" decision and unlock the full potential of technology to drive growth and profitability.

Take the Next Step

Want to see how your firm compares? This analysis is part of the 2026 WealthTech Benchmark Report, the most comprehensive study of RIA technology adoption.

📊 Read the Full Benchmark Report — Proprietary data on technology adoption, maturity tiers, and strategic roadmaps
🔍 Grade Your Website Free — Instant analysis of your firm's digital presence and technology stack
🏢 Explore the Software Directory — Compare WealthTech vendors and build your ideal stack

Build vs. Buy: When RIAs Should Develop Custom WealthTech Solutions